Intro: The relationship between our spoken language and the language we use when we text is that the words we write and the way we say it influences each other therefore changing them constantly.

Paragraph 1:

Albion: I’ve gonna go but if u are available later than we can play if you’re not a chicken.

Okorie: Are u funny*

Albion: Yes cause I bet you’re laughing as well

Okorie: Fine after I’ll vs u

Albion: Whenever ur ready

Okorie: I’ll invite u 2 a party

Albion: Are u sure u don’t wanna play on Monday as u might need some practice

Okorie: Ur a joka

Okorie: Set ur thing to online

Okorie: I’m doing it now

(40 mins later)

Albion: I’m online

Okorie: Would u like 2 talk on Skype

Albion: Ok

Okorie: Are u sure u wanna play

Okorie and I use several homophones to communicate with each other. A homophone is an abbreviation of the original word but still sounds and means the same. We use it as it’s shorter than writing the same word but still means the same. We use this when we say the letter “u” rather than saying the word “you”.

When I use the word “gonna” it isn’t actually a word. If I was to write in standard english I would’ve said got to. “gonna” isn’t actually any shorter than got to but I use it as I was speaking to Okorie rather than texting. If I was to stand face to face I would’ve used “gonna” and I did so here. This device is known as a phonetic when you write something the way you would have said it if you to talk. This supports Mr Waugh’s theory as I am closer to talking by saying “gonna” in my texting rather than in standard english.

Kai uses an exaggeration to show that iPhone is the best and uses that when he says ‘dominates the world, world domination’. This would show that Kai believes the iPhone is the best and uses a hyperbole as a tool of argument.

Person two also uses the world “Wasteman”. This world is an insult to say to that person that they do nothing with their life or nothing much. In this case, it was used to insult the camera person about they can’t do anything else with their life so they have to film person one and two having their conversation about the iPhone and the Samsung.

The reason why Arbies and myself used repetition was to illustrate emphasis on each of our points. In Arbies’ case when he say ‘Look at the table. Look at the table.’ he used it to show how low Chelsea were in the league table. In my case when I say ‘and what, and what and what’ it was to show that there wasn’t really any problem with what his point was trying to state.

I use 2 omissions ‘so what?’ and ‘so?’ to shorten the sentences to almost make the argument flow more. Additionally, I am talking informally to my friend so I had no need to standardise the sentence and choose to keep it informal.

Finally, I used a filler when I said ‘Er’ to give myself some time to fully complete the point I was trying to make and once again it is informal. For it to be standard I should’ve said ‘It was’ rather than ‘Er’. Furthermore, I believe that if a person uses a filler in a argument it could be of a benefit to the opposing side as it shows them that you have got them in a situation they haven’t thought of and they are on the back foot in the argument and are struggling for points to counter your points.

Albion: Ok fair enough ……..

Arbies: you are doing rubbish

Arbies: you are doing rubbish.

Sir, I am really sorry but I haven’t found anymore in my transcription.

Arbies: What position are you in the league?

Albion: 17th. So what?

Arbies: You’ve played 5 games.

Albion: So?

Arbies: You’ve got 4 points. Let me bring out the table.

(Brings out phone)

Arbies: Look at the table. Look at the table.

Albion: Yh. Fair enough maybe we are 17th in the table and what and what and what. Just because we are 17th does that make a difference?

Arbies: Yes it does.

Albion: What difference does that make then? 5 games gone it’s early days in the premier league how many games are left Arbies oh wait 33 game left. And I personally think that despite the poor run of form that we are on now I believe we will finish above you to be totally honest.

Arbies: Above us? Let me just remind you about what Steven Naismith did to you.

Albion: He scored a hat-trick.

Arbies: Naismith.

Albion: We banged in 6 goals against you.

Arbies: When was that?

Albion: Er, around 3 seasons ago.

Arbies: That’s the past, lets talk about now.

Albion: That was the past as well that was on Saturday and today is Tuesday.

Arbies: 5 games we’ve played 10 points, 5 games you’ve played 4 points.

Albion: And that’s 2 losses, 2 losses. do you know how easy 2 losses are.

Arbies: No, 3 losses. Crystal Palace, Everton and Man City.

Albion: So, fair enough yes City we did deserve to lose because we played terrible.

Arbies: You’re doing shit.

Albion: No we’re not.

Arbies: You’re doing shit.

Albion: Maybe we are so what. This is what I don’t understand yeah, we dominate, lets take the Everton gamer for example, we dominated possession the entire second half.

Character 1: Yeh.

Character 2: Oh, fanks for answering geeza, I know what I mean.

Character 3: Oi, Gimme that wher’ve u been you fool making us rinse ow our credit.

Character 2: Mr dawes is well on the war path with u brov Yeh.

Character 1: What cause of the bag and that.

Character 2: What bag? Cause u missed in lesson and that u chief.

Character 3: Gimme that, the bag weren’t a problem Teegsy never mentioned it he bottled it. Oi, u coming over mine to play computer later.

Character 1: No, man I’m at home now and I got some business to sort out.

Character 3: What business?

Character 1: Business that minds it own I’m out.

After 15 yrs in the FBI, Daniel Jr was relaxing in his back porch overlooking the sea. This is now his life. Behind him his 400 m 2 mansion. As soon as you walk through the grand elegantly marble carved door you see a chandelier hanging for the very, very high ceiling about 3 floors high. To the left we see a solid oak door with a lighter toned door frame. To the right, a similar door and door frame but it had a distinguishable item on the top of the door frame. Today, by standards during this time of year, it was pleasantly warm and the sky was clear with the sun shining down on the mansion. There was a decent south easterly breeze swirling round the mansion making the day feel pleasant. You had to get up really close to the item to see that it was a plack in honor of his father, Daniel Sn, who tragically died working for the FBI some 20 yrs ago now. This hall is quite cold with several air conditioners due to the stairs. The stairs are made of ice. Directly in front of you as you enter the mansion they go straight up but then have 2 ways once you get up to the top. The handrails, polished so cleanly that you can see your reflection as clear as a mirror, were made of a fine diamond and also glowed in the beaming sunlight. On the roof, a helicopter pad to land his helicopter. Walking out of the house into the front section in the garages either side of the stone track with a mini roundabout with a fountain similar to those you find in Trafalgar Square. To the garage on the right are all of the luxury cars including his Lamborghini. A light orange with a orange stripe down the middle and is also a convertible.

Compare the ways in which death is presented in Kafka’s and Swanton’s versions of The Metamorphosis?

This essay will explore the Metamorphosis answer specifically death. We will study the book as well as the film directed by Chris Swanton. Franz Kafka was born in 1883 and died in 1924. The events that took place in his family and personal life has influenced what the story and the message is. His father was a bully and made him feel inferior. Furthermore, I am going to explore the similarities and differences between Kafka’s written version and Swanton’s film version.

In both versions of The Metamorphosis Gregor’s death is presented as a relief to Gregor. In the novella we can tell this when Kafka says ‘but it seemed to him that they were gradually becoming weaker and weaker’. The language device used is repetition. This phrase ‘weaker and weaker’ would imply that the pain is going away and becoming less and less of an issue even though he knows that death is near. Whereas in Swanton’s film version we can see the relief Gregor feels when he is walking ever so slowly back to his room and there is a sense of acknowledgement. This scene shows me that he understands that there is no need to worry about his family and he needs to do what’s best for the family even if that means death. Therefore in both versions of the Metamorphosis, death is presented as a relief to Gregor when in the film his resignation and in the book him crumbling to his death. When I say crumbling I mean that he is barely able to stand and he has recently been very passive and surprised he was able to stand on those skinny legs.

In both the film and the novella Gregor’s death is presented as a relief to the family. This is shown in the novella when Greta (Gregor’s sister) ‘sprung forward nimbly’ and cried out ‘Finally!’ to her parents. Kafka manipulates the syntax by placing the adverb at the end of the sentence in order to build tension. The language used by Kafka when he says Greta ‘sprung forward nimbly’ would show me that she is exhausted of taking care for this foul verminous bug and cannot no longer be able to look at this creature. Her then crying out ‘Finally’ would show that she now believes that she is done with taking care of him and is almost fed up. In comparison, in Swanton’s film version he uses the emotions that Greta shows when she is saying her long speech about how they no longer need this pest in their lives. Once she has finished and Gregor had returned to his room not only the exhaustion of the fact that she doesn’t want to care for Gregor anymore and I believe also that she was exhausted from the whole speech. I also believe that she can’t look after him anymore and is happy to close the door and give up on the person that she thought until now was Gregor.

In the film version of The Metamorphosis, Gregor appears to die of his family’s rejection whereas in the novella he appears to die of his physical wounds. In Kafka’s version we can see this when Kafka states that Gregor’s thoughts were that he in fact was surprised that he could walk on those skinny legs. The quote ‘he had pains throughout his entire body’ suggests to me that his physical wounds were the main cause of death in the novella and it further illustrates that 2 lines later when the rotten apple in his back had inflamed the surrounding area. The language device used by Kafka here is a hyperbole. The word ‘throughout’ implies that Gregor has a pain all through the body which is essentially making him paralysed. On the contrary, in Swanton’s film version the emotions that Greta is showing shows that the family feel as if they can’t and won’t look after him anymore. She goes on to say how the ideology of the family is incorrect and must be changed and no longer think that its Gregor and they need to get on with their lives without Gregor. Gregor eventually accepts that it should be time to go back to his room and sadly the family (he once cared for and fed pretty much as he was the only person to earn an income in the household) don’t want him under the same roof as him anymore.

My final point is that in both the novella and the film, Gregor’s perspective is used to show the sadness of his death through both the physical wounds and the family’s rejection of him. In Kafka’s version, we can tell that this story is written through the eyes of Gregor as he is the only person’s who thoughts we can see/read. For example, when Greta had just finished her speech about how the family can no longer keep up with him in the house we heard his thoughts of him that he should probably turn himself around before anything else could happen. It shows sadness as he is talking about the physical pain he has had to endure all of his beetle life. The language that Kafka uses is exaggerating the physical wounds that Gregor has had. In Swanton’s film version we can tell that Gregor’s perspective is used when the camera is mainly focused on Gregor. This camera shot is known as point of view (POV). The POV shot is used to show the viewer that death is imminent. The POV shot exaggerates the sadness of Gregor’s death. We also see the family and the last moments of his life through the eyes of Gregor. The music is the background – which is slowly fading away  – is focused on the events that take place in Gregor’s chaotic life. Once again in the film a narrator is used to hear what is only going on in the the mind of Gregor who cannot speak.

Throughout this essay, I have explored how the theme is presented in the novella written by Franz Kafka and the film directed by Chris Swanton. Death in the book is presented as a relief not only to Gregor but also to the entire family and how he dies in the book of physical wounds. However, in the film it is still a relief to Gregor and the family but he appears to die of family rejection particularly with the speech that the unlikely Greta spoke out her opinion and was absolutely exhausted by the end when she screeched finally. Finally, they both also use Gregor’s perspective to demonstrate the sadness of his eventual death.